The Shame-Silence Loop: Gender Differences in Brain Injury Disclosure and Recovery
disorder (FND), and the systemic changes needed to encourage disclosure and improve outcomes.
Gender Differences in Incidence and Recovery
Growing evidence indicates that women sustain TBIs through
mechanisms distinct from men's, with domestic violence, falls and motor-vehicle
collisions featuring prominently (Valera, 2022). In domestic abuse, women may
incur repeated mild TBIs that remain unrecognised amid intimate partner
violence. The prevalence of intimate partner violence (IPV) in sub-Saharan
Africa, for instance, is estimated to be one of the highest globally, with a
strong, yet often overlooked, association between IPV and TBI in women (Anto-Ocrah
et al., 2022). Across studies, women report prolonged post-concussion
symptoms, headache, dizziness, cognitive fog, lasting weeks to months longer than
men. These disparities arise from both biological and psychosocial factors.
Biomechanically, sex differences in neck strength and head-neck kinematics may
amplify women's vulnerability to rotational forces, leading to diffuse axonal
injury even in low-impact trauma (Covassin et al., 2016). Hormonal fluctuations
also modulate neuronal excitability and inflammatory responses, potentially
exacerbating injury sequelae during certain menstrual phases. Furthermore,
women with TBI often experience significant changes in menstruation,
reproduction, and sexual activity, areas that are frequently neglected in
routine health screening and discussions by clinicians (O'Reilly et al., 2023;
Haag et al., 2016).
Beyond pathophysiology, sociocultural gender norms shape women's
injury experiences. Women often prioritise caregiving roles over personal
health, delaying symptom reporting to maintain domestic or occupational
responsibilities. Fear of not being believed—rooted in historical minimisation
of women's pain—drives internalised shame, deterring women from seeking care or
disclosing cognitive and emotional difficulties. The cumulative effect is
delayed diagnosis, under-treatment and a heightened risk of chronic neuropsychiatric
complications, including depression, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and
persistent cognitive impairments (Valera, 2022). Research also shows that
patients' perceptions of themselves and their understanding of gender can
transform after TBI, highlighting the importance of acknowledging gender as a
dynamic process in care delivery (Baldeo et al., 2023).
The Shame-Silence Loop
The Shame-Silence Loop
describes a self-reinforcing cycle whereby gender bias, trauma and diagnostic
blind spots inhibit women's disclosure of brain injury, perpetuating
under-recognition and under-treatment. Three interlocking processes fuel this
loop:
Gender Bias and Disbelief
Stereotypes framing women as more emotionally labile or prone to
somatisation lead clinicians to dismiss reports of cognitive or affective
symptoms as psychological rather than neurogenic. In emergency and primary-care
settings, women with concussive injuries are less likely than men to receive
validated assessment or imaging (Bazarian et al., 2010), reinforcing beliefs
that women exaggerate or 'make up' their symptoms. This bias is exacerbated by
systemic issues such as racism and distrust within healthcare systems,
particularly affecting Indigenous women who may experience prolonged waiting
periods and disengagement from care due to a perceived lack of culturally safe
and appropriate services (Fitts & Soldatic, 2024). Furthermore,
interactions with healthcare professionals can be marred by cultural
insensitivity, stereotypes, and "othering," which further deter
disclosure and hinder quality care delivery (Taha et al., 2023).
Trauma and Self-Silencing
Many women incur brain injury in contexts of interpersonal
violence. Survivors of intimate partner violence often experience shame and
fear of retaliation, rendering them reticent to report injuries that could
disclose abuse. The psychological trauma compounds neurological symptoms, and
women may misinterpret cognitive lapses as evidence of personal failure, rather
than injury, deepening their self-silencing.
Diagnostic Blind Spots
Clinicians have limited training in recognising subtle executive
dysfunction, such as planning deficits, mental fatigue or emotional lability,
that frequently accompany mild TBI in women (Valera, 2022). When symptoms lack
overt motor signs, they risk misclassification as functional neurological
disorder (FND) or psychiatric illness, leading to inappropriate referrals and
treatment delays (Stone et al., 2020). This misdiagnosis not only fails to
address the underlying brain injury but may further stigmatise the patient,
discouraging future disclosure. Gender stereotypes in rehabilitation can also
set unrealistic goals for recovery, hindering effective treatment (Hanafy et
al., 2023).
Under-Recognised Executive Dysfunction
Executive functions encompass the cognitive processes necessary for goal-directed
behaviour—planning, working memory, cognitive flexibility and inhibitory
control (Lundy-Ekman, 2002). Even mild TBIs can disrupt frontostriatal networks
critical to these functions, yielding difficulties in multitasking, time
management and emotional regulation (O'Sullivan & Schmitz, 2001). In women,
executive dysfunction may manifest subtly: forgetting appointments, struggling
with household management or increased irritability—all easily attributed to
stress, hormonal changes or personality. Standard concussion assessments focus
on balance and basic cognitive screening, inadequately capturing executive
impairments (Valera, 2022). As a result, women with high-functioning roles—professionals,
caregivers, students—may overcompensate for deficits until burnout triggers
acute decompensation. Without recognition of their cognitive vulnerabilities,
they receive little rehabilitation support targeting executive control, such as
metacognitive strategies or environmental modifications. The incongruence
between pre-injury roles and responsibilities and post-injury abilities,
particularly in gendered domestic and occupational roles, significantly
contributes to community integration challenges for women with TBI (Lian et
al., 2025; Haag et al., 2016).
Case Study: The High-Functioning Professional
Consider Dr Sarah, a 42-year-old clinical psychologist who
sustained a mild TBI after falling from a bicycle. Her initial
symptoms—headache and dizziness—resolved within two weeks, leading her GP to
declare her 'recovered'. However, upon returning to work, Sarah struggled with
previously routine tasks: constructing therapy formulations required greater
effort, clinical documentation took twice as long, and she found herself
emotionally exhausted after a day of patient consultations.
When Sarah mentioned these difficulties during follow-up, her GP
suggested work stress and possible depression. Sarah, doubting herself, delayed
seeking further assessment for six months while compensating through working
longer hours and reducing personal commitments. Eventually, neuropsychological
testing revealed significant deficits in working memory and cognitive
flexibility, executive functions critical to her clinical work. The delay in
appropriate diagnosis meant six months without targeted cognitive
rehabilitation or workplace accommodations, prolonging her recovery trajectory.
This case illustrates how subtle executive dysfunction can be
misattributed to psychological factors, particularly in high-functioning women
whose compensatory strategies mask underlying deficits. The ability to
'perform' despite injury often leads clinicians to overlook genuine
neurological impairment, perpetuating the Shame-Silence Loop.
Mislabelled Functional Neurological Disorder
Functional neurological
disorder (FND), characterised by neurological
symptoms unexplained by structural pathology, carries substantial stigma. Women
constitute up to 75% of FND diagnoses, often presenting with motor or sensory
disturbances (Stone et al., 2020). Many cases likely reflect underlying brain
injury that evaded detection. For example, mental fatigue post-TBI can cause
fluctuating motor weakness misinterpreted as functional motor symptoms, while
attentional lapses may appear as 'conversion' episodes. Once labelled FND, patients
confront disbelief from both clinicians and social contacts, exacerbating their
shame and reinforcing the silence surrounding their true neurological injury.
Emerging research calls for neuroimaging and electrophysiological studies to
differentiate FND from subtle structural damage, advocating for a
'dual-diagnosis' framework when both functional and organic processes coexist
(Hall-Patterson et al., 2019).
The diagnostic overlap between post-concussion syndrome and FND
creates particular challenges for women. Both conditions can present with
headache, dizziness, fatigue and cognitive complaints. However, the attribution
of symptoms to psychological versus neurological causes often follows gendered
lines, with women more likely to receive functional diagnoses even when
presenting with identical symptoms to their male counterparts. This diagnostic
disparity further entrenches the Shame-Silence Loop, as women internalise the
message that their physical symptoms reflect psychological fragility rather
than genuine injury.
Bridging the Gaps: Asking Better Questions
To disrupt the Shame-Silence Loop, clinicians, researchers and
systems must refine their approach to women's brain injury:
Trauma-Informed Assessment
Incorporate routine screening for interpersonal violence and
PTSD in TBI evaluations, recognising that domestic abuse is a leading cause of
women's brain injury. Use validated tools, such as the HELPS Brain Injury
Screening Questionnaire, in community and emergency settings to detect mild
TBIs that patients may downplay (Corrigan & Bogner, 2007).
Executive Function Screening
Expand concussion protocols to include ecologically valid
executive function tests, such as the Frontal Assessment Battery or Behavioural
Assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome, ensuring subtle deficits are
identified (Lundy-Ekman, 2002). These assessments should evaluate functioning
in real-world contexts, not merely laboratory settings, as compensatory
strategies may mask deficits under controlled conditions.
Gender-Sensitive Interviewing
Train clinicians in gender bias awareness, urging them to
normalise symptom reporting ("Many women experience prolonged cognitive
fog after head injury") and explicitly validate patients' experiences.
Clinicians should create safe spaces for disclosure, acknowledging historical
patterns of disbelief while offering evidence-based explanations for symptoms.
This includes being sensitive to cultural backgrounds and addressing issues of
cultural insensitivity and stereotypes that patients may face (Taha et al.,
2023).
Designing Better Systems
System-level reforms can further empower women to disclose and
access care:
Integrated Care Pathways
Develop multidisciplinary clinics co-locating neurology,
psychiatry, psychology and social services. Such hubs facilitate comprehensive
assessment, enabling simultaneous treatment of neuropsychiatric and
psychosocial sequelae (Valera, 2022). Integrated pathways should recognise the
potential co-occurrence of traumatic brain injury and psychological trauma,
particularly in cases of domestic violence, offering coordinated care rather
than forcing patients to navigate fragmented services. Crucially, these pathways
must be culturally safe and appropriate, especially for vulnerable populations
like Indigenous women, to build trust and prevent disengagement from care
(Fitts & Soldatic, 2024).
Community Outreach and Education
Public health campaigns should spotlight women's risk of TBI in
domestic violence and everyday accidents, dispelling myths that only men
sustain serious brain injuries. Peer-support groups, both online and in person,
offer safe spaces for women to share their experiences and strategies for
navigating healthcare. Educational initiatives should target not only
healthcare providers but also employers, educators and social services,
ensuring broader recognition of women's brain injury presentations. Educational
interventions that address sex and gender influences in TBI can improve
knowledge, attitudes, and skills among both patients and caregivers, helping
them adapt to changes in roles and behaviours post-injury (Hanafy et al.,
2023).
Research Prioritisation
Funding agencies must mandate sex-disaggregated data in TBI
research, exploring hormonal, neuroanatomical and psychosocial moderators of
injury outcomes. Greater inclusion of women in clinical trials will yield
evidence-based guidelines tailored to their needs. Research should specifically
address the intersection of gender, trauma and neurological injury, examining
how sociocultural factors influence both injury mechanisms and recovery
trajectories (Fitts & Soldatic, 2024). There is a significant need for research
that specifically focuses on the experiences of women and girls with TBI to
inform clinical care, policy development, and advocacy services (O'Reilly et
al., 2018).
Clinical Implications for Mental Health
Professionals
Mental health practitioners occupy a pivotal position in
disrupting the Shame-Silence Loop. As frontline clinicians who often encounter
women with undiagnosed TBI presenting with mood, anxiety or cognitive
complaints, psychiatrists, psychologists and therapists can serve as critical
bridges to appropriate neurological care.
Differential Diagnosis Considerations
When evaluating women with recent-onset mood disturbances,
anxiety or cognitive complaints, mental health professionals should routinely
inquire about head injuries, including seemingly minor incidents and potential
domestic violence. Symptoms such as emotional lability, concentration
difficulties and fatigue—often attributed to primary psychiatric conditions—may
represent post-concussive sequelae requiring neurological intervention
alongside psychological support.
Adapted Therapeutic Approaches
Standard psychotherapeutic protocols may require modification
for patients with unrecognised TBI. Sessions may need to be shorter,
incorporate more breaks and utilise written materials to accommodate cognitive
fatigue and memory difficulties. Cognitive-behavioural techniques should
address not only psychological symptoms but also practical strategies for
managing executive dysfunction in daily life. Rehabilitation interventions
should also focus on flexible and adaptive responses to gendered demands in the
lived environment of persons with TBI, recognising that gender roles and
identities can be profoundly affected by the injury (Baldeo et al., 2023).
Advocacy Role
Mental health professionals can advocate for patients within the
healthcare system, facilitating appropriate neurological referrals and
validating the neurobiological basis of symptoms often dismissed as 'just
psychological'. This advocacy extends to helping patients navigate disability
accommodations in educational and occupational settings, recognising that
invisible cognitive impairments may require formal support despite preserved
physical functioning. They can also champion the need for rehabilitation treatment
to look beyond rigid sex and gender stereotypes, promoting an individualised,
person-centred approach (Hanafy et al., 2023).
Conclusion
Women's underreporting of brain injury represents a confluence
of gender bias, trauma-related self-silencing and diagnostic blind spots—what
this article terms the Shame-Silence Loop. Biological factors, including
sex-specific biomechanics and hormonal influences, intersect with sociocultural
norms that trivialise women's pain and cognitive struggles. Subtle executive
dysfunction often goes unnoticed, while functional neurological disorder
diagnoses belie underlying neuropathology. To break this cycle, we must ask
better questions—incorporating trauma screening, executive function assessment
and gender-sensitive interviewing—and design systems that integrate
neurological and psychosocial care. Only by validating women's experiences,
advancing research on sex differences and reforming clinical pathways can we
ensure that all survivors of brain injury receive timely, effective support.
Mental health professionals, particularly those in leadership
positions within healthcare systems, have a unique opportunity to champion
these changes. By recognising the neuropsychiatric complexities of women's
brain injuries, implementing trauma-informed assessment protocols and
advocating for integrated care models that are culturally safe and responsive,
they can help dismantle the barriers that have historically silenced women's
experiences of brain injury. The path forward requires not only enhanced clinical
awareness but also institutional commitment to addressing the gender
disparities that continue to shape women's journeys through neurological injury
and recovery.
References
Anto-Ocrah, M., Aboagye, R. G., Hasman, L., Ghanem, A.,
Owusu-Agyei, S., & Buranosky, R. (2022). The elephant in the room: Intimate
partner violence, women, and traumatic brain injury in sub-Saharan Africa. Frontiers in Neurology, 13, 917967. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.917967
Baldeo, N., D'Souza, A., Haag, H., Hanafy, S., Quilico, E.,
Archambault, P., Colquhoun, H., Lewko, J., Riopelle, R., Colantonio, A., &
Mollayeva, T. (2023). A thematic analysis of patients' and their informal
caregivers' gendered experiences in traumatic brain injury. Disability & Rehabilitation, 45(10), 1636–1645. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2022.2071483
Bazarian, J. J., Blyth, B., & Mookerjee, S. (2010). Sex
differences in the incidence and prognosis of mild traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 25(6), 461–469.
Corrigan, J. D., & Bogner, J. (2007). Screening for
traumatic brain injury in women survivors of intimate partner violence. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 22(4), 323–333.
Covassin, T., Moran, R., & Elbin, R. (2016). Sex differences
in reported concussion injury rates and time loss from sport: An update of the
national collegiate athletic association injury surveillance program from
2004-2005 through 2008-2009. Journal of
Athletic Training, 46(2),
175–180.
Fitts, M., & Soldatic, K. (2024). Temporalities of
emergency: the experiences of Indigenous women with traumatic brain injury from
violence waiting for healthcare and service support in Australia. Health Sociology Review, 33(2), 160–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/14461242.2024.2345596
Haag, H. L., Caringal, M., Sokoloff, S., Kontos, P., Yoshida,
K., & Colantonio, A. (2016). Being a woman with acquired brain injury:
Challenges and implications for practice. Archives
of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 97(2 Suppl 1), S64–S70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2014.12.018
Hall-Patterson, A., Aybek, S., Benbadis, S., Dworetzky, B. A.,
Edwards, M. J., & LaFrance, W. C. Jr. (2019). The roles of neurology and
psychiatry in functional neurological disorder. The Lancet Neurology, 18(12),
1098–1107.
Hanafy, S., Quilico, E., Haag, H., Khoo, Y., Munce, S., Lindsay,
S., Colantonio, A., & Mollayeva, T. (2023). An educational intervention to
promote a culture of gender equity among persons with traumatic brain injury
and caregivers: A pilot study. Frontiers
in Rehabilitation Sciences, 4,
1160850. https://doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2023.1160850
Lian, L., Coupland, R., Sant’Ana, T. T., Colantonio, A., &
Mollayeva, T. (2025). Community Integration Challenges of Men and Women After
Traumatic Brain Injury: A Reflexive Thematic Analysis of Lived Experiences
Through a Gender Lens. The Journal of
Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 40(2),
E163–E174. https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000000994
Lundy-Ekman, L. (2002). Neuroscience:
Fundamentals for Rehabilitation (2nd ed.). W.B. Saunders.
Maas, A. I. R., Menon, D. K., Adelson, P. D., Andelic, N., Bell,
M. J., Belli, A., et al. (2017). Traumatic brain injury: Integrated approaches
to improve prevention, clinical care, and research. The Lancet Neurology, 16(12),
987–1048.
O'Reilly, K., Wilson, N. J., Kwok, C., & Peters, K. (2023).
An exploration of women’s sexual and reproductive health following traumatic
brain injury. Journal of Clinical Nursing,
32(5-6), 901–911. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.16510
O'Reilly, K., Wilson, N., & Peters, K. (2018). Narrative
literature review: Health, activity and participation issues for women
following traumatic brain injury. Disability
& Rehabilitation, 40(19),
2331–2342. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2017.1334838
O'Sullivan, S. B., & Schmitz, T. J. (Eds.). (2001). Physical Rehabilitation Assessment and
Treatment (4th ed.). F.A. Davis.
Stone, J., Burton, C., Carson, A., Murray, G. K., Warlow, C.,
& Sharpe, M. (2020). Functional symptoms and signs in neurology: Assessment
and diagnosis. Journal of Neurology,
Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 91(9),
756–761.
Taha, S., Bibi, A., Wali, R., Boakye-Dankwah, A.,
Worthen-Chaudhari, L., & Wilder, J. (2023). A Grounded Theory Approach to
Characterizing Cultural Insensitivity Toward Care Professionals/Collaborators. Archives of Physical Medicine &
Rehabilitation, 104(3), e7–e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2022.12.018
Valera, E. M. (2022). Understanding traumatic brain injury in
females. Frontiers in Neurology, 13, 907005. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9070050/
Comments
Post a Comment